منابع مشابه
Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients?
In this paper I argue that it is morally important for doctors to trust patients. Doctors' trust of patients lays the foundation for medical relationships which support the exercise of patient autonomy, and which lead to an enriched understanding of patients' interests. Despite the moral and practical desirability of trust, distrust may occur for reasons relating to the nature of medicine, and ...
متن کاملGvt shifts duty of care to underpaid public sector doctors.
All three deaths, a mother and one of her twins at the Odi Primary health care centre near Pretoria and a woman whose uterus ruptured at the Mafikeng Hospital, happened during a ‘go slow’ and a wildcat (unprotected) strike by doctors at these respective institutions. The illicit industrial action ran from 16 to 28 April, when the remaining strikers agreed to return to work and use recognised ba...
متن کاملDuty of Confidentiality and HIV/AIDS: PD v Harvey.
The issue of doctor-patient confidentiality in situations where the doctor can reasonably foresee that third parties associated with the patient could be put at risk by the patient's medical status is a continuing conundrum. In a case heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court in 1999, BT v Oei (1999) NSWSC 1082, the court held that a medical practitioner owed a duty of care to the sexual partn...
متن کاملDo doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?
Doctors require knowledge of the potential benefits and harms of different treatment options to inform clinical decision making. Patients also require this information to make an informed choice between different treatment options. This knowledge base is generated from robust clinical research such as randomised controlled trials. For this knowledge base to advance, doctors and patients must be...
متن کاملDo doctors owe a special duty of beneficence to their patients?
The continuing debate in these pages about whether or not doctors are among those groups in society who have special, supererogatory moral obligations to their clientele seems important enough to pursue, even at the acknowledged risk of boring some readers. In this issue Professor Downie furthers the discussion by arguing against three claims defended in a previous editorial (1). Those claims w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 1987
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6566.246-a